20th Century Fox’s X-Men franchise recently turned 17. After all this time, the film franchise is still going strong with consistently strong box office receipts. Even with the Disney merger, Fox plans to release a new film, X-MEN: DARK PHOENIX, next year. While this all looks promising for the franchise, X-MEN is more at risk than ever. This is because Fox has failed to have proper X-Men character development.

X-MEN Characteres
X-MEN (2000) poster. Image Courtesy of 20th Century Fox

X-MEN: APOCALYPSE focused more time on big Hollywood extravaganza than developing members of the team.  This has been a consistent problem in the film series. X-MEN has some of the best and most beloved characters in all of comics. Fox needs to learn how to properly utilize these characters to make their X-Men films great again.

X-MEN Character Retrospective

Looking back at the original X-MEN in 2000; at this time, a film of this nature had not come out. Nobody had ever made a film about a team of superheroes. Instead of focusing on the whole team, the filmmakers decided they needed to establish a central character to introduce into the pre-established world of mutants. They decided that Wolverine would be a perfect pick because of his popularity in the comics.

So, Wolverine became the focal point in this conflict between Professor X’s X-Men and Magneto’s Brotherhood. In retrospect, this decision was a smart one. It made Wolverine and Hugh Jackman become a household name, and it helped establish the X-Men through the eyes of our protagonist.

READ: Hugh Jackman recently ended his iconic run with LOGAN. Check out our review here!

However, this decision resulted in many of the central X-MEN team members being sidelined most crucially Storm, Jean Grey, and Cyclops. In the next two movies, directors Bryan Singer and Brett Ratner had a great opportunity to develop these characters further; but, instead, they continued to focus on Wolverine.

X-Men Character
X2: X-MEN UNITED poster. Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine noticeably center. Image Courtesy of 20th Century Fox

Now in this first trilogy of films, it is unfair to say that Wolverine was the only great character. Characters like Nightcrawler, Rogue, and Stryker left their mark on the franchise. Furthermore, Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen portray Professor X and Magneto fantastically; but there is no arguing that this trilogy is mainly Wolverine’s story.

Every film, including the LAST STAND which partially focuses on the DARK PHOENIX SAGA, has Wolverine driving the action. So once these three films were finished, the studios thought that they might as well ditch the rest of the X-Men and just make films about Wolverine. The result was the much reviled X-MEN ORIGINS: WOLVERINE.

New Trilogy, Same Wolverine

After the critical failure of X-MEN ORIGINS, director Matthew Vaughn tried his hand at rebooting the X-MEN franchise. His film X-MEN: FIRST CLASS focuses on the origin of the X-Men with Charles Xavier (who would become Professor X) and Erik Lensherr (who would become Magneto). This film does a fantastic job of developing these two characters and their ideals. FIRST CLASS introduced a breath of fresh air for X-MEN with a new exciting team that Vaughn could develop over several movies.

Then Bryan Singer took over for Vaughn for the sequel, X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST. The film beautifully bridged the previous trilogy with this new iteration of the X-MEN. However, Singer once again brought in Wolverine to steal the show from every other important mutant. This stalled the growth of other important characters in this new series such as Beast, Havok, or even great new characters like Quicksilver. The movie still hinges on Wolverine, Professor X, Magneto, and now Mystique who is here played by Jennifer Lawrence.

X-Men Character
X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST Poster. Wolverine stands center once again. Image Courtesy of 20th Century Fox.

Starting in this film, it seems that Singer began building Mystique to be the new central character taking over from Wolverine. This decision was and continues to be a huge mistake for multiple reasons.

Firstly, Mystique was never a central X-MEN protagonist and, in fact, she was a villain. Secondly, and most importantly, Jennifer Lawrence’s performance as Mystique is nowhere near rivaling Hugh Jackman’s iconic Wolverine. So, while X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST is a great film it failed to develop the characters first that Vaughn introduced in FIRST CLASS; as we see this would create problems for the future of the franchise.


Bryan Singer decided to bring back classic characters like Cyclops, Nightcrawler, Storm, Jean Grey, and Angel for X-MEN: APOCALYPSE. Fans rejoiced. Finally, Bryan Singer would create the X-Men everybody loved from the comics. Not quite.

READ: Want to hear more thoughts on APOCALYPSE? Here’s our review of the film. 

Instead of focusing on one central character, the film has no focus. At times Mystique seems like the main character, but on other occasions, the film focuses once again on Professor X and Magneto’s relationship. The actual focus of this film should have been on the new X-Men. Instead, Cyclops, Storm, and Jean Grey are once again sidelined in an X-Men movie; and then Singer rubs salt in the wound by having Wolverine show up for a pointless cameo. Come on!

X-Men characters
Jean Grey, Nightcrawler, and Cyclops in X-MEN: APOCALYPSE. Image Courtesy of 20th Century Fox

It does not help that APOCALYPSE has an entirely unoriginal plotline where a super-villain (spoilers) wants to take over the world. That is not to say that good films cannot have villains with cliched goals. In fact, both AVENGERS movies have villains trying to take over/destroy the world; but the AVENGERS know that the focus should be on the characters, not the spectacle (even though the spectacle is also cool). APOCALYPSE seems to think that cool special effects are enough to make people want to see superhero movies.

The redeeming quality of APOCALYPSE is Michael Fassbender and James McAvoy’s performances as Magneto and Professor X respectively. This is because Vaughn developed these characters so well in FIRST CLASS that we still care for them two movies later. We lose the other characters in the action, and the audience doesn’t feel a thing for any of them.


X-MEN: APOCALYPSE received mixed reviews, but it made enough money to justify a sequel. This year the franchise announced the next film in its series, X-MEN: DARK PHOENIX. Some would argue this was a smart move as THE DARK PHOENIX SAGA is one of, if not the, most beloved stories in all of X-Men. I, however, think this is a terribly foolish decision.

READ: Why do people still love X-MEN: DARK PHOENIX? Find out here!

I am afraid that the filmmakers at Fox have not learned their lessons from APOCALYPSE. See AGE OF APOCALYPSE, and DARK PHOENIX SAGA from the comics have a lot of similarities. Both are incredibly large-scaled, world threatening storylines starring well-established X-MEN characters.

The problem is that this iteration of X-MEN has failed to establish well-developed characters besides Professor X and Magneto. The characters that should be the central figures in DARK PHOENIX are Jean Grey, Cyclops, and the new team of X-Men. These were the characters that Singer failed to focus on in APOCALYPSE.

If DARK PHOENIX is to succeed, they must rapidly develop these characters so that we care for them. We cannot have another X-Men film held up by Professor X and Magneto since that did not work the last time. The franchise cannot bring in Wolverine to give the film extra adrenaline; of course, there is another solution…

Revamp The Franchise

It seems like Fox is committed to making DARK PHOENIX but I think the better move is to make a few films starring a new version of the X-Men. We were promised that APOCALYPSE would begin a new era of the X-Men. It did not do this. Now that X-MEN has finished its second trilogy, I think that they should start a new, smaller-scale franchise starring this new class of X-Men.

Like the original trilogy, these films could focus on the X-Men as a team. Cyclops could lead the team consisting of Jean Grey, Nightcrawler, Storm, and any other characters that they want to focus on. My request is that they keep the team to no more than six characters.

This franchise has had difficulty balancing too many characters. James McAvoy’s Professor X could return, but as a mentor figure like, he is in the comics. The villain of the first film should be somebody like Mister Sinister. He is a great villain for the X-Men, but he does not require the characters to be pre-established or fight powerful entities.

X-Men characters
A Scene from X-MEN: APOCALYPSE. New Team of X-Men teased in the film. Image Courtesy of 20th Century Fox

If Fox made two great films concentrating on this new X-Men team and sufficiently developed them, then they could make DARK PHOENIX.  Right now, it feels like they are rushing in head first into a storyline that does not seem like a natural next-step for the franchise. I hope with all my heart that X-MEN: DARK PHOENIX is a fantastic comic book movie, but right now it has the odds going against it.


  1. Duane

    July 16, 2017 at 4:28 am

    I dream of a world in which Fox and Marvel lived in peace. A world where fox worked with marvel when they planned out their x universe and as stated by the writer of this article, did not focus on one character or rehash the same character arc over and over again. I dream of a world where, while taking creative liberties to establish this franchise, the writers respected the comic origins and the essence of the characters remained faithful inside their live action incarnations. A leading geneticist in the comics would not be a CIA agent (esp sine there’s a character they could have used for that role anyway) and a classic villain would not become an xman because the actress just became a huge star. A world of animated films and solo films to flesh out the universe. Sadly I’ll never see that


  2. Simon

    July 16, 2017 at 2:22 am

    Terrible analysis, dude. Maybe not the first X-Men of 2000, but the X-Men franchise has been more about character development than any of the Marvel Studios films. Avengers 1 and 2 were ALL spectacle and no substance. Loki, who was amazing in Thor, was so 2 dimensional in Avengers. They forced in-team conflict in the Avengers films to try to make it more interesting…it wasn’t. Of course the movies were so fun to watch, but, don’t get it twisted. Character development was not a top priority. And it’s only getting worse. Who cares about anybody in Dr. Strange? And the character development in Guardians 2 was a joke. I remember my heart breaking for Hank (Beast) in First Class watching him turn blue. I remember that last line from Mangeto to Charles in Days of Future Past “All those years spent fighting each other…to have a precious few of them back” absolutely tore on my heart strings. And, as mediocre as some people say Apocalypse is, when the main villain begins to choke Mystique to death at the end, Charles’s reaction was heart-wrenching. The character development in this franchise has been just fine. In fact, the Marvel Studios films could stand to learn a thing or two on how to make their villains and character relationships more interesting.


Show ComicsVerse some Love! Leave a Reply!