Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Reddit Share on Pinterest Share on Linkedin Share on Tumblr This year marks the 30th anniversary of Tim Burton’s 1989 film BATMAN, a watershed moment in the superhero genre. In fact, BATMAN ’89 wasn’t so much a film as it was a pop culture phenomenon, taking 1989 by storm on the silver screen and with “Bat mania” merchandise. Perhaps most importantly, it marked the next step, after Richard Donner’s SUPERMAN, in proving that comic book movies could indeed be profitable. Batman and Vicky Vale, Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures This is not to say BATMAN ’89 was a perfect movie. Looking back at it through a modern lens, there’s definitely a flawed simplicity to the film’s narrative. But as a transition vessel for the big screen debut of a dark Batman, it worked. The setting, the music, the Batmobile visuals — they all remain iconic decades later. BATMAN ’89 Gets to Altering Perceptions In many respects, BATMAN ’89 was the logical adaptation and extension of nearly a decade of game-changing comic storytelling. The 80’s marked a metamorphosis for audience’s perception of Batman. While a previous generation had the campy Caped Crusader of the Adam West TV series, comics had taken the character darker and deeper. Revolutionary entries like Frank Miller’s THE DARK KNIGHT RETURNS and Alan Moore’s THE KILLING JOKE were illustrative of this change. However, it was not enough to change the wider audience’s conception of the Detective. BATMAN ’89 was needed to take this “dark and gritty crimefighter” image and make it mainstream. A deeper exploration of BATMAN ’89 reveals how it changed the game for superhero movies. Much like SUPERMAN, it introduced multiple genre elements that modern superhero films and blockbusters continue to replicate. From hero-villain dynamics to controversial casting decisions, it took risks that few films up to that point even attempted. These risks gave BATMAN ’89 its resonance as a movie simultaneously timeless and very much a product of its time. BATMAN ’89: Gothic Wonderland From the opening notes of Danny Elfman’s iconic score, BATMAN ’89 sets a mood immediately. It’s grim, haunting and quite eerie, much like the visual style of Gotham City. Burton constructs a sweeping mass of gothic noir architecture that contorts itself into the sky. The structures feel inhumane and uncanny, an early visual indicator of the state of the city itself. It almost seems no wonder Gotham attracts crime and corruption looking as it does. A Truly “Gothic” Gotham, Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures For all intents and purposes, BATMAN ’89 was not a kids film. There are still some obvious traces of camp, leaning into the underlying insanity of the character’s existence. The art museum scene where Joker and his goons deface an art museum to the tune of Prince music certainly comes to mind. But characters die in many ways — electric buzzers, killer pens, falling from heights and guns. Plenty of guns. It’s a rather sinister and disturbing type of silly. The World’s First Fully Functioning Homicidal Artist Jack Nicholson’s Joker embodies this mix of scary and silly. Formally a gangster named Jack Napier, his transformation borrows one element from THE KILLING JOKE and early comic tales. He only “becomes” Joker after getting knocked into a vat of acid that disfigures his face and skin. Jack Nicholson as the Joker, Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures His methods here, however, seem to pick and choose from several sources, both comic and otherwise. The film emphasizes Joker’s gift for chemistry but also makes him obsessed with “death as art.” His actions feel like anarchic comedic terrorism. Widespread, random, and entirely turning on his whims. He sees Gotham as little more than a playground to exploit for homicidal tendencies. He vacillates between philosophies — one that suggests murder is all in good fun because life is a joke and another that argues mayhem is a deeply important form of artistic expression. Much like Gotham City’s pervasive corruption, the Joker’s insanity feels disturbingly casual. He’s not out of place as a madman; if anything the city feels tailor-made for him to terrorize. Such darkness is by no means “realistic” the way the Nolan films interpreted its characters. But it is a maddening darkness, a tonal shift that proved just what audiences needed to buy into this “new” Batman. You Wanna Get Nuts?!! Michael Keaton’s casting as Bruce Wayne/Batman became the original source of angry comic fanboy backlash. Without any internet in 1989 ,Bat-fans wrote over 50,000 letters expressing their horror at “Mr. Mom” playing Batman. They feared an imitation of Adam West, as opposed to the dark and gritty vigilante previously promised. Thankfully, like most fanboy backlashes, the final product dismissed everyone’s worries. Keaton is fantastic in BATMAN ’89 as both Bruce and his masked alter ego. Part of this no doubt is owed to Keaton’s elevation of the character’s near-psychosis. His Bruce is fidgety and aloof, uncomfortable even in his own home and especially surrounded by guests. He even sleeps upside down, like a bat. You can tell right away that something is off about this man even before you know about his parents’ murder. Michael Keaton as Bruce Wayne, Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures Comparatively, Keaton’s Batman is a capital V vigilante, making his debut by beating up two purse robbers and threatening one over the rooftops. He’s a cipher, a mysterious brooding figure with little rationale given for what he gets out of fighting crime. All we know is that it’s an obsession, one that drives Bruce to pursue this lifestyle at the expense of normality. A single whisper of “I’m Batman,” and it’s obvious this character is intimidating and has issues. Even when he falls in love with Vicky Vale, Bruce struggles to outright admit his secret identity. Part of that is because, from his psyche’s perspective, Batman is the real self. Bruce Wayne is just the cover identity that exists when Batman isn’t working, mainly to fund his equipment and stay out of sight. In his own quirky way, Bruce’s actions reflect a different, more subdued madness compared to the Joker’s “crazy and proud” lifestyle. Utilizing the Source Material SUPERMAN: THE MOVIE never used a specific comic storyline as a story basis. Rather, the film sought to capture the essence of Superman’s personality and moral code as a hero. By comparison, BATMAN ’89 drew influence from comics of the O’Neil/Miller/Moore era, including, especially, THE KILLING JOKE. Burton used THE KILLING JOKE as a template to explore themes of duality and the isolated outsider. Batman and Joker are two halves of the same coin, individuals driven by their madness to pursue objectives. One’s got a clown face and murders people with joy buzzers; the other dresses like a bat and beats up criminals. Batman & Joker: Symbiotic Enemies, Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures Burton heightened this connected duality further in BATMAN ’89. In what remains one of the enduring controversies of the film, both are unwitting byproducts of the other’s actions. It is eventually revealed a young Jack Napier killed Thomas and Martha Wayne. This, of course, led to Bruce becoming Batman. As Batman, Wayne then brings this connection full circle. While attempting to subdue the gangster Napier, the hero fails to prevent Jack from falling into the acid. No longer are they just symbolically linked. Instead their dark sides have literally given rise to one another. It works thematically in the context of the movie. However, for many it took away from the idea that random crime destroyed Bruce Wayne’s youth. BATMAN ’89, in turn, did much to influence the source material. The movie shaped the visual iconography of Batman for years to come. Burton’s design for the grapple gun, smoke bomb, gliding cape and the Batmobile and Batwing all become iconic staples. Their influence even extended beyond film and print, contributing to works in other mediums like BATMAN: THE ANIMATED SERIES and the Arkham video games. Early Stages, Creative Liberties At the same time, however, Burton took plenty of liberties with the source material. Most notably, this Batman kills people- a big no-no amongst die hard bat-comic devotees. Batman does a lot of questionable things, but he’d never cross the line into murder. Yet Keaton’s Batman kills many Joker’s goons with a variety of bullets and bombs. In the end, arguably, he even causes Joker himself to fall to his death. None of this is in line with Batman’s moral code as presented in the comics. BATMAN ’89’s success also comes with “first draft” drawbacks, namely the lack of focus on Batman himself. Looking back at it, this ambiguity creates something of a double-edged sword. On one hand, the audience, like Vicky Vale and Gotham’s population, see him as an enigma shrouded in mystery. Yet it also makes Keaton motives outside the madness less comprehensible. He’s does this because he’s obsessed, nothing more to it. Batman Fighting Sword Goon, Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures This style benefits Batman the legend more than Batman the character. We spend more time analyzing what the Joker wants — Vicky’s love, his face on the $1 bill — than Bruce’s inner goals. Beyond also wanting Vicky, his motives seem to stop at defeating Joker. In a weird way, that reflects who this Bruce Wayne is. He’s so committed to this ongoing crusade that being Batman feels more natural than acting like a regular person. It’s definitely a “less is more” characterization compared to the Nolan Trilogy.Those films detailed everything behind Bruce’s decisions, from his affiliation with bats to his refusal to kill. BATMAN ’89 instead prioritizes the dark zaniness of its character’s actions over the protagonist and supporting cast’s desires. It works, but it doesn’t make for the most complex on-screen depiction of Batman. Just the one with the best-looking cowl. Holy Bat-Legacy BATMAN ’89 Despite not being perfect, BATMAN ’89 holds up pretty well after 30 years. Thanks to Burton’s artistic design, the film remains visually dense and full of atmosphere. This style, alongside Keaton and Nicholson’s performances, balanced out the uneven screenplay and liberties taken with the source material.However, arguably BATMAN ’89’s most revolutionary element was turning the superhero movie into an event. In between STAR WARS and the MCU, this became the film everyone had to see in a crowd. It was commercialized and hyped as not just a movie, but a staple of the Hollywood summer blockbuster machine. This marketing campaign to the masses would soon become the de facto approach for future blockbuster advertising. Best Batmobile Ever, Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures While its story is messy and its characters often underdeveloped, we all owe Tim Burton’s BATMAN ’89 a debt of gratitude. For the medium, it shifted the future of comic book adaptations away from Filmmation cartoons and television shows to the big screen. And for the character, it cemented Batman’s reversion from total camp to dark and brooding while still managing to have fun. And all this without making Keaton sound like he had throat cancer under the cowl! Everything about today’s cinematic marketing world can be traced back to BATMAN ’89, for better and for worse. Yet, what’s ironically kept BATMAN ’89 timeless is how it blended noir, grit, and camp to produce something that felt wholly authentic. Not many modern comic book movies can attest to having that auteurist vision.